Cranbrook charges ahead with deer cull, despite unresolved legal challenge
Cranbrook continues deer cull.
Cranbrook Daily Townsman article on the continuation of killing deer.
Cranbrook charges ahead with deer cull,
despite unresolved legal challenge
Sally MacDonald / Cranbrook Daily Townsman
February 14, 2013
CRANBROOK, B.C. - Cranbrook is pushing forward with plans to
cull up to 30 mule deer roaming the city, despite pledging
last year to hold off from any killings until a B.C. Supreme
Court legal challenge is settled.
The city announced Thursday that council made the decision
"after much careful deliberation," reads a statement from
corporate communications officer Chris Zettel.
"Due to concerns around public safety raised both by the
R.C.M.P. and council, the city will not at this time be
providing any additional details surrounding the population
reduction activities."
The trapping will occur in "several key areas of the
community," based on complaints received by both the city and
the Conservation Officer Service, Zettel said.
Cranbrook was granted permission to carry out the cull by the
Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations in
late 2012.
But with a court case underway in a nearby city, opposition
from animal advocates and the possibility the wrong deer were
being killed, the city had been refraining from further
action.
The city would not provide details on when or where the cull
will occur, while council and other staff refused to answer
questions from the media.
"The city will provide a comprehensive review to the public
once these activities have been completed," said the
statement.
A day before the announcement, the B.C. Deer Protection
Coalition took out a full-page advertisement in the city's
local newspaper asking "Will Cranbrook kill deer this winter?
Rumour says yes."
The ad also asked Cranbrook residents to call or email the
organization if they see a trap set in the community, saying
members of the group will set out to monitor what
surfaces.
Colleen Bailey, a spokeswoman for the Humane Treatment of
Urban Wildlife, said the group is against the city's
decision.
"Culls are cruel and they simply don't work," she said,
adding it's their view that public safety is not at risk if
the city provides more details.
"This is simply being used as an excuse to conduct the entire
operation under the cover of secrecy."
Last April, council approved a second cull of up to 50 deer
in Cranbrook. But Mayor Wayne Stetski said in October that
the second cull had been put on hold pending legal action
over a cull occurring in the city to the north,
Invermere.
Stetski said the city wanted to wait in case the court
decided there was something "inappropriate or perhaps
incomplete" in the public process related to that cull,
because the process was the same as being used in
Cranbrook.
The city first culled 25 urban deer with clover traps in
November 2011, but 11 were the white-tailed variety which was
not the intention of the cull.
Cranbrook was the first of three East Kootenay communities to
carry out a cull with a provincial license.
Kimberley, B.C., culled 100 deer in January 2012, while
Invermere was set to cull 100 deer in February 2012 before a
court injunction put a hold on the plans.
The Invermere Deer Protection Society started a civil suit
against the District of Invermere, claiming it did not
conduct enough public consultation.
Although the court injunction halted the cull for much of
February, the society's request to extend the injunction
failed and eventually Invermere killed just 19 deer before
its permit expired.
In May, B.C. Supreme Court gave permission for the society's
civil suit against the district to continue. That case is
still before the court. A hearing was set to be held in
January, but was delayed.
(Cranbrook Daily Townsman)